And one we maybe are.
1. The Side Show art for Part Two of the HOH competition:
1. The Side Show art for Part Two of the HOH competition:
![]() |
She's Alive! |
![]() |
Long live that bottom caption. |
2. Gary's face on winning Part Two:
![]() |
Hallelujah |
3. How in the final HOH round, Emmett kept waiting for Gary to answer before locking in his. Until it came down to the final question, I was ready to call shenanigans.
![]() |
Hmmm |
(Emmett, cheat? Never.)
4. Gary evicted Emmett.
You guys, Gary fucking evicted Emmett!
![]() |
"Watch oot for the gay guy" |
I can still hear the bells.
5. Alec and Gary both tearing up at Gary's answer to Alec's question:
![]() |
Alec should have brought his sleep mask to the finale |
![]() |
Watch check |
7. The final death throes of The Sheyld (sic):
![]() |
1 of 2 |
![]() |
2 of 2 |
8. Topaz's hilarious hissy fit over the vote reveal:
![]() |
Someone call the ophthalmologist! |
![]() |
Check the lower left corner - hi, Dan! |
![]() |
Jokerized |
![]() |
Topaz'd |
And that's ignoring the fact that, as Alec has pointed out multiple times, Big Brother Canada has had a Big Brother UK influence from the start. Being a big character and beloved by the audience was going to be a part of the game, and all players should have understood that from the Suzette Power Shift onward. That was a part of the game Gary played brilliantly.
That said, is it the end of the world that Gary lost? Of course not. He'll do fine with the $20K he won, it gives him a sympathetic story to propel his public career, and really puts his "the money doesn't matter" talking point to the test.
I'm sure there was a moment inside where he wanted to do this:
But he didn't, at least not on camera. Instead, we got Beauty Pageant Runner-Up Face:
Mature, gamer Gary is taking the reigns, and immature, selfish Gary is going to have to take a backseat. Totally for the best, and now he's a shoo-in for Big Brother Canada All-Stars in a few years.
And Jillian can take her $100K and her milkman and get off our screens at last. Was she a good player? She was all right. I don't blame Alec and Peter for the "bitter jury" stuff - it seems like their contention, which is worth pointing out, was that Jillian was unnecessarily nasty, making deals she didn't need to make, breaking them when she didn't have to break them, and then refusing to admit what she'd done. If she'd been willing to admit it in the jury questioning, Peter might not have rolled his eyes and checked the time, but he clearly knew she wouldn't.
Jillian is a good player in the Rachel Reilly "Most HOH wins" kind of Big Brother game, but without Emmett, she wouldn't have gotten to the end, and without a disaster of a vote, she wouldn't have won.
Still, she won fair and
So congrats, Jillian, for what it's worth. Ultimately, your strategy of sticking with Emmett turned out to be the thing that got you to the end.
I'd say drinks are on you for that first real-world date.
![]() |
Exeunt |
Jillian did win fairly though. And she sure deserved the win more than Gary. Or Peter.
ReplyDeletePeter also said that he wouldn't have voted for Jillian no matter what.
http://www.xoxojes.com/2013/05/a-foiled-plot-anyone-but-jillian.html
She played strong, she played hard, and they really only didn't want her to win because she was female. If it was a male making those plays (aka Emmett, even making more fake alliances than Jill did.) They would've respected him.
No, Peter wouldn't have voted for Jillian, but that doesn't change the fact that her answer was horrible.
DeleteI also don't think it had anything to do with gender, Jillian played a very different game from Emmett when she was HOH versus when he was HOH. Many of her lies were unnecessary and her attempts to justify herself as a "nice person" were pretty despicable. She was played a horrible jury game from the start and knew it - she was just put off her guard when Gary came back talking about how the jury respected her, which speaks to his gameplay.
In a game that's social, competitive, strategic and populist, a good social/populist player deserves to win every bit as much as a decent competitive/strategic - and more so if they have the majority of the jury on their side.
I don't dispute that she won fairly, but it's hard to say it was a straight-up victory, since it all came down to factors entirely beyond her control.